SYED MUHAMMAD ALI THROUGH REAL MOTHER MST. MEHVISH BATOOL versus SYED RAZA HUSSAIN
Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 suit for recovery of minor son restitution allowance (minor) suits the recovery of past maintenance allowance from October 2008 to April 2012 at a monthly rate of Rs. 5,000, A total of Rs 2, 10,000 and a future allowance of Rs 15,000 per month were issued by the Family Court. And stated that the judgment and decree were not presented by the defendant in the Court of Appeal, after which the Plaintiff filed before the Family Court from October 2008 to January 2013 a monthly recovery allowance of Rs. 10,000 monthly. Filed a new case for 5,20,000 and future care allowance was rejected by the family court at a monthly rate of Rs 15,000. The plaintiff's only claim in the fresh suit was Rs 5,000 to Rs 10,000 per month, and the plaintiff on future maintenance allowance. He took a different stand at claiming Rs 15,000 in both suits, claiming a past restoration allowance, from which he negated his first suit, which mentioned all expenses, including admission to school. , But he later changed his stance and claimed. An increase in past care should have been filed by the plaintiff, in the circumstances, against the Family Court, or the first decision and order passed by the applicants. n Failure to increase future care allowance should have been filed with the Family Court because of changes in the circumstances and the Family Court did not take any unlawful action by the plaintiff on failure of it.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
