Although section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 365 bail, further investigative grants were designated with the specific role of kidnapping in the FIR, the FIR story is therefore not understandable. There was no direct or indirect evidence against the accused in connection with the story of the FIR which was described as highly unlikely. Both statements of the alleged kidnapper were inconsistent and contradictory to each other; in the circumstances, the credibility of the statements of the dependents cannot be trusted. Abducted medical evidence proved the fact that the kidnapper was a woman of ease and that the stained shrubs were not sent to the group for trial to determine the fact that the FI. These swabs in the R-filing were delayed by thirty-eight days, which cannot be explained, the possibility of an FIR being discussed, cannot be ruled out, the matter of further inquiry of the accused, also entered under bail. , Stand
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
