RAI MUHAMMAD KHAN versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT POLICE, LAHORE
Section 409, 420, 468, 471 and 489F Corruption Act (Second 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request FI Cancellation of Applicant Specially Designated in FI Was charged, if the alleged FIR was taken according to their value, then the same initial party disclosed the commission of illegal crime, in connection with the negligence of the plaintiff. In order to appreciate the shortcomings raised by the applicant's counsel, a fact investigation must be carried out, which will require summary action under Article 199 of the Constitution. They cannot be prosecuted by the High Court, investigating numerous checks, fraud / misappropriation of Union Council funds, forgery of fraudulent documents on fraudulent documents and the commission of fraud, The High Court concerned purely with the question of facts, while exercising arbitrary jurisdiction, could not eliminate the FIR in the preliminary phase of the investigation would be equivalent to a controversial inquiry into the role of the investigator, Which was not valid under the law's conduct and investigation procedures, HIK The writ can not test the scope of the investigation. The investigating agency, whose initial constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by any High Court in its preliminary stage, shall be before vacating the duties of the investigating agency or the trial court. Neither fit nor desired. Even otherwise, the applicant has more than one
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
