QUAID-E-AZAM MEDICAL COLLEGE, BAHAWALPUR THROUGH PRINCIPAL versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
O XXI, Rr 10, 30 Delegation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Delegation Implementing College, the Prosecutor had asked the following question orders passed by the following two courts, under which the defendant filed. The delay request was accepted by the dispute. The decision was made to rest at the Supreme Court level between the parties, which resulted in a plea of condolences, with a delayed explanation of the reasons, which led to an extension of the term. Was granted, the affidavit filed in it was supported. Undisclosed orders indicate that an affidavit by a college is not on record to confirm the disputes / reasons offered by the respondents to seek extension at any stage. Has been placed, in the absence of such counter-affidavit, the application for condolences taken by the affidavit and his delayed endorsement will be deemed to have been accepted by the opposition party / applicant. Had nothing to do with the unnecessary orders to prosecute the High Court's interference, when prosecuted under the law In terms of section 1908 of the Act to use their discretionary powers 5 was correct definition of the factors which limit its condolences. Both of the following courts were not investigated nor sought any intervention by the High Court in mediation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
