Sections 11, 18, 23 and 54 require the referee court to determine the amount of compensation paid by the referee court, which requires 15% of the acquisition of the land, pursuant to section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Increased charges were charged. Under section 44 under the aforesaid Act, the appeal of the referee's court was extended and defendants objected to the appeal while the appellant was the Land Acquisition Collector, while being unknown, the military state officer on the memorandum Signed who also pasted. His official seal No Walatatama, signed by the appellant, was filed. Various petitions were also filed with the appellant and the affidavits were sworn in by the Military State Officer in support of the statements. It appears that the appeal was filed under the instruction and did not work on the judgment of the Military State Officer, who is taking advantage of the occupied land, e. He could not be entertained at such a stage because of the reasons given by the lawyer for the application. Oily, the request was made when the appeal filing period was already over. Secondly, no formal application was filed in this regard. Third, the request was made again by the Military State Officer. And ultimately cannot represent the Standing Council; a valid request from the Province / Land Acquisition Collector; and the Land Acquisition Collector may be made because of the inability of the Advocate General Appeals to be rejected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
