Sections 9 (a) (iv) (vi) and (xii), 10, 15, 18 (g), 24, 32 and F 33 F of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (LX of 2007), charged with defining section 7 evidence , Which was prosecuted. An appeal was filed by the Judge Accountability Court along with nine others, an appeal filed by the accused against his conviction and conviction, against which a petition was filed under Section 7 of the National Reconciliation Ordinance, 2007 , Which will retract / terminate the action against him. The High Court and the High Court filed appeals against their convictions and convictions before exercising jurisdiction under Section 7 of the National Reconciliation Ordinance 2007 if they were tried and convicted with a public office holder. So the action against them was abolished. The main culprit was acquitted or the prosecution was terminated under the National Reconciliation Ordinance, 2007, the benefit of which could be extended to the accused as they were both co-accused in the same boat as public servants. They had already been acquitted by extending the benefit of Section 33F of the National Accountability Ordinance, as included in the National Reconciliation Ordinance, 2007, the accused was entitled to the same relief under consolidation. The High Court ordered that the proceedings be reversed / dismissed and dismissed in reference initiated against the accused. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
