MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAHIM YAR KHAN
Article 5 and Schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The petitioner's constitutional application for dissolution of marriage objected to the contention that the plaintiff had wrongly resided with the plaintiff. The place was shown. That during the reconciliation proceedings before the trial, his statement was not recorded. That the plaintiff (wife) was not instructed to present her written statement in the restoration of her marital rights. And that no application of the openings was taken in the reversal. But the Family Court ruled in the case on the basis of illiteracy, on the basis of wrongful disclosure of the residence, the plaintiff had clearly stated in the plaintiff when his abduction concern was addressed by 4 duties. Was thrown, she left the place. Living in RK with my brother. This was because he had filed a lawsuit on the basis of this residence under R6 of the 1965 Rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, a lawsuit could be filed for dissolution of the marriage where the wife usually resided. Was rightfully filed in court. In place of the RK, the recording of the defendant's statement during the reconciliation proceedings of the former case was not required by any law but it was not that the case of Khulla version was not entered in the plaintiff, in this case The verdict could not be given, it was a false claim because the plaintiff's contents clearly stated on the petition raised by the applicant's plaintiff that the plaintiff plainly stated that he was a BA student. And the defendant was illiterate, who
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
