Find a Lawyer

QAZI INDUSTRIES AND SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CORPORATION THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE

The tender of Para 17 tender was rejected on the basis of the tender rejection that it was not on the letter head of the tender submission party in Para 17 of the Manual, therefore it was declared compulsory. The quotation has to be submitted on a fixed tender form. However, some exceptions were made where referrals were submitted ?? Special instructions to all Pro forma tenders to the Letter Head, insisting that the contractor must refer to the specific invitation for the tender form. There were no general terms for the various agreements. To submit the quotation on the letter head, all the authorities insist that the form should be on the letter head and the only basis for rejecting the tender / quotation is that it was not on the lender head of the tender, also against the purchase manual (Punjab). Was violated. General / Special instructions in the above supporting formats \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• LYALLPUR CHEMICALS LTD. through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division 2009 PTD 1697
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAHIM YAR KHAN 2009 YLR 1700
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2009 YLR 1702
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1703
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES ZONE, FAISALABAD v. MASOOD TEXTILE MILLS LTD., FAISALABAD 2009 PTD 1707
• ABDUL MAJID v. State 2009 YLR 1711
• AIDY VEE & CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Director v. TAXATION OFFICER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE 2009 PTD 1715
• Mst. RUKHSANA BIBI v. S.H.O. P.S. KAMEER, DISTRICT SAHIWAL 2009 YLR 1715

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocate from Islamabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes