The plaintiff's lawyer for the accused accused of considering the validity of the section 2 (2 (b) evidence) chose to accept the conviction on the murder charge and requested a lower sentence with the request that the sentence be justified. The motivating part of the incident escaped the notice of the trial court. Along with filing an FIR, the witnesses of the prosecution hid and suppressed the original motive, which resulted in the killing of the accused, There was no other option left for them at the time, but to admit that the deceased was walking with his sister. Yin filed contradictory statements about the motive record in light of both of his claims that the victim's sister was the sole bone of contention with the victim's close proximity, which led to his own trouble. Was involved in making illicit proximity with the accused's sister and thus assisting her to some extent the normal death sentence was not guaranteed by law, in this case the death sentence was repeated With the benefit of 382B, he was imprisoned, in the light of the statements of both witnesses by the CCPC, it was not difficult to say It was an ordinary human moral and legal heirs were not entitled to any compensation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
