Find a Lawyer

MST. RUKHSANA BIBI versus S.H.O. P.S. KAMEER, DISTRICT SAHIWAL

Article 10 (2) / 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, FIR The petitioner's case for attempting to constitutionally plead was personally presented and stated that he was charged with the intention of committing adultery with the defendant. They were not seduced or taken away by the US. The petitioner's husband and herself suffered from stress and resided with their relative, the petitioner having been voluntarily admitted to the Secretariat. The Petitioner further stated that he had also filed a case for dissolution of the marriage that nothing was revealed during the inquiry that under S: 10 (2) of the offense or adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, Section 16 of 1979. Under the FIR filed against the applicant, it was dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• QAZI INDUSTRIES AND SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CORPORATION through Sole Proprietor v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Higher Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Lahore 2009 YLR 1706
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES ZONE, FAISALABAD v. MASOOD TEXTILE MILLS LTD., FAISALABAD 2009 PTD 1707
• ABDUL MAJID v. State 2009 YLR 1711
• AIDY VEE & CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Director v. TAXATION OFFICER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE 2009 PTD 1715
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2009 YLR 1716
• MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ v. State 2009 YLR 1718
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1719
• MAJEED AHMED KHAN v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2009 YLR 1729

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

pakistani advocates Bagh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes