MAJEED AHMED KHAN versus ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD
Sections 12 and 54 from the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VIII, R 10, and O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2, 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, for specific performance of the contract and defense for permanent injunction Plaintiff's interim injunction for filing a written statement, grant and leave with a permanent injunction with the claim filed for possession by specific performance was granted by the court to the defendant and the defendant's The petition filed for discrimination relief was dismissed, the written statement failed to enter, their defense was dismissed by the trial court, Filed an appeal against the trial court's decision, dismissed by the appellate court, filed a constitutional petition, giving at least 14 opportunities for the plaintiff to file in writing, but he did so within a fixed period of 30 days. Failed to pass, the verdict passed by the trial court was unthinkable. After a gap of one year, the appellate court, upset at the judgment of the appellant, found that the appeal was unenforceable and that the action was turned into a revision petition, but it was also banned because it had been banned for 90 days. There was a need to file in. The impugned order limitation did not apply to the petition for review of the defamation petition under the provisions of section 5 of the Act, 1908. The affidavit is unreasonable, the petition has no merit, it was excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
