NAEEM RIZWAN versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION),PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 156, 157 and 173 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Identifying Transfer of Investigator In Identifiable Cases The evidence of one of the defendants was found to be defective and it was Kept in column The other two accused of the challan, however, are mourning the final outcome of the investigation, invoking the trial for the murder charge, saying that the complaining complainant requested the transfer of the investigation, which was constituted by the Standing Board. Established under the Kee and Police Order, 2002, and said that the Board recommended the transfer of the Inquiry, the Adel Inspector General of Police informed the Regional Police Officer that the Board's recommendation was made to record as The case was filed by a sub judice complainant in a constitutional petition for transfer of inquiry in light of the recommendation of the standing board Chaudhry. The allegation of this case was presented in court against all the accused. After the challan is presented by the trial court for the offense or innocence of the accused in the evidence, it will be decided to re-examine the case, even though it was valid, but the inquiry after the challan submission would be meaningless. This case has already been reviewed. , Investigation of the case, under the circumstances, would not work for any purpose. The constitutional petition was rejected by the High Court with the observation that the applicant could have liberty to prosecute the accused in his case before the trial court. Is.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
