The testimony of Sections 2302 and 8308, the benefit of the story of the suspect as alleged in the additional judicial confession of the accused, cannot be ascertained for the reasons that if such a confession was actually committed by the accused. First he lived in front of his brothers and mother who lived. In the same house; and why would she commit an extra-judicial confession before someone who hated her for providing financial support for her children as an accused husband. Who had been caring for the accused for the past 9/10 years. After knowing the truth of the confession, the accused will not be released and will have made the first attempt to hand the accused over to the police, who instead of doing so forced himself to go to the police and record the statement. ? Unnatural and unreliable evidence of judicial confession, which was tried by the prosecution through the prosecution's testimony, cannot be believed because it did not record it while meeting the required legal requirements. had gone. Section 164, a confessional statement under CRPC, the magistrate did not bother to take steps to identify the accused. The fact of the judicial confession was not established by the prosecution of Aid as the result was not a confession. It was reported that the blood-stained knife was recovered from the accused's home about a month and a half after the alleged incident, and in addition to both witnesses, the recovery memo referred to a judicial confession, which was unwarranted by the accused. As a means of recovery
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
