Section 6 Courts of Reconciliation, 1962, R10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Case for Recovery of Money Ex-Parte Decree Defendant Plaintiffs Case for Recovery of Money Based on Pesticide Supply done. It should appear despite issuing a notice. A previous order was issued against him and, on the occasion of the defendant's grievance against him, he filed a constitutional petition suit which was filed before the Union Councilor. It has been shown that the defendant Tehsil. MM was a resident while the plaintiff was a resident. The subheading `H the even that the plaintiff himself showed and filed by himself, it was clear that the two parties were not residents of the same Union Council Moderator or the Court of Union of Union Consent ' H enter had no jurisdiction to entertain. And decide on the case that the remedy for the appeal is available, the direct constitutional petition is inadmissible and cannot be entertained, it can be said that it was not necessary to take advantage of the remedy of the appeal, as the High Court There was jurisdiction for entertainment. Except for such decisions and injunctions that the Constitution Petition was granted without jurisdiction, there may be an entry in these situations directly, except when the Constitutional Petition is admitted for a regular hearing. Was denied, the defendants could not be instructed to enter the Court of Appeal decision and the Court of Reconciliation, which were set aside in these circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
