Section Contract Contract Act (IX of 72 I72 of), Section 55 suit was executed by the plaintiff in the favor of the plaintiff in the sale of the suit land to the plaintiff, in some performance of the contract, the possession of the suit land After receiving the money and the rest, the claimant was delivered. Payment was made at the time of the sale confirmation or during that time the defendant brought a suit for the specific performance of the contract Both suits were settled and the trial court dismissed and brought the suit filed by the plaintiff / vendor. The case was dismissed on appeal filed by the plaintiff by the plaintiff / plaintiff and was dismissed and the case filed by the shopkeeper for the specific performance of the contract was ordered to be reed by the lawyer for the plaintiff. Said that the time was the essence of the contract and in any case the defendants were obliged to do their part of the contract till the due date. The jam, the partner section no order can not be granted in favor of the under 55. The Nutrition Act, 1872 was not given by the plaintiff to constitute the contract; the notice, under the circumstances, was not given to the defendant by the plaintiff to perform the sale agreement which he intentionally obtained. The evidence was brought on record for the execution of the sale agreement, and the verdict came to the conclusion that the case was under arrest by a civil court in a pending injunction in relation to the suit property, which is joint The KATA was established in connection with the decision and injunction. The details approved by the appellate court were rich and every aspect was dealt with momentarily by the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
