ZARSHID versus THE STATE THROUGH DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, FBR, LAHORE
Section 497 (2) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s), 156 (1), (89), 157 and 178 bail, the grant of the role of further investigation in relation to the accused persons was when the undercover vehicle If checked, the accused will be sentenced to six years imprisonment under the provisions of section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act 1969 for the offenses involved in the crime of illegal clothing and other smuggled items. The section 497 (1) clause, the PC was not attracted by section 2 (s) of the Customs Act, 1969, which was a definition clause while smuggled cloth was seized on charges of vehicle confiscation and confiscation. Was. It has not yet been determined by the relevant authorities during the trial whether the goods recovered from the accused and other smuggled goods have come under the definition of smuggled goods. And whether the provisions of section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969 were attracted even otherwise it was necessary to rule out whether the accused were merely drivers and cleaners respectively or a proprietary interest in clothing. Whether or not the trial was not started even though an FIR was lodged on 10 2 2008, in cases where, in the matter of inquiry, in the case of further inquiry, they were entitled to guarantor privileges. In these circumstances, bail was granted,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
