Find a Lawyer

FIAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 bail, the defendant's grant name was listed in the FIR and 76 copies of the liquor, half a liter of alcohol was recovered from the accused. This would mean that 38 liters of alcohol was recovered from the accused. The offense, which did not fall under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, was not a former record holder of the CC accused. Under the circumstances, he was admitted on bail

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Brigadier (R.) SAEED ISMAT CHAUDHRY v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2009 YLR 2341
• RIAZ AHMAD v. State 2009 YLR 2345
• RIAZ AHMAD v. State 2009 YLR 2346
• ISHRAT JEHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Housing, Physical and Environmental Planning Department, Lahore 2009 YLR 2349
• ZARSHID v. THE STATE through Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation, FBR, Lahore 2009 YLR 2355
• ABDULLAH KHAN v. MUHAMMAD EISA KHAN 2009 YLR 2356
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER, MUZAFFARGARH 2009 YLR 2365
• MUHAMMAD NASIR v. State 2009 YLR 2370

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

list of supreme court advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes