Section 2 (b (b)) Definition of Evidence, Complaint Reduction According to the contents of the IFIR statement and the testimony of the other prosecutors, the complainant pointed to the line and said that the two witnesses discussed each other in all material aspects of the case. The witnesses were subjected to interim investigations by the defense, but their statements did not reveal any significant harm to the prosecutor, further testifying by eyewitnesses by medical witnesses, who confirmed the wound. On account of the nature of the case the Acolyte account was fully confirmed, the weapon used for its seat, dimensions and injury. Witnesses like Crime Recovery / Stolen Recovery made a drastic improvement, saying at the time of recovery that the theft had been stained with fresh blood, while said recovery had an impact on five of the incidents. The testimony of the witnesses regarding the recovery process was very doubtful the day after the IS incident, not on each other's contradictory terms and even though the complainant had already tried to present a plan or a pre-consultation case. But the fact was a sudden outburst that was just a blow to the livestock dispute. The accused person was charged, which, unfortunately, did not prove a fatal complaint in the FIR, nor in his statement was the accused responsible for committing such a crime. At the time of the commission of the crime, the accused was only seventeen years of age. Eighteen years of prosecution had thrown a wide net to include more and more innocent people, the prosecution's case was substantiated by an ocular account, and
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
