MUHAMMAD IRSHAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 8
Sections 2 (c) (i), 13 (2) (i) (3) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for payment of rent for the house and the eviction request on the basis of the personal need of the landlord. ? Evidence regarding the landlord and tenant between the parties rejected the eviction request on the ground that the respondents could not prove the relationship between the landlord and the tenant, however, the rent controller Reverses the search and accepts respondents' takedown request. For the alleged rent payment, the defendants had on record that no rent was processed in this regard and the applicant was evicted only on the oral claim that he was in the premises and was paying rent. Permanent transfer of premises was issued in the name of the deceased and after his death his wife, along with his legal heirs / defendants, became the applicant owner and the petitioner was the brother of the deceased and he was the member of the family. Lived in the premises as a The landlord and tenant had no relationship between the parties. Counsel for the defendant argued that the applicant would become a tenant through the practice of law. Due to the fact that throughout the litigation, the respondents have never been accused of being a tenant under them, no doubt if a landlord is a tenant with their landlord Denying a relationship is always denied, but it was primarily the landlord's duty to establish it. Its status is by first proving the existence of a tenancy and if so
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
