RASHID MASIH versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-COLLECTOR SIALKOT
Section & 42 & Su 54 Case for Declaration and Permanent Order Subject Defendant Plaintiff filed a claim for declaration and permanent injunction claiming that he was the owner of the suit property, which was owned by him and by a private division of the suit. For this reason, the defendants claimed that the Christian community jointly owned the suit property and that the plaintiff had no concern with it and the trial court's decision and decision and the trial court's decision regarding the same case. Appeal court verdict dismissed as the case filed against the order was dismissed The RIDEAU. The appeal did not yield wise results, which could not be termed a "judicial order" when the plaintiffs insisted that they had been in possession of the suit for decades and decades, In the Revenue Record, which was not sought by the trial court, the affidavit of cash was established and the order was passed by the appellate court, and the matter was passed to the appellate court. Was forwarded which will be considered as hearing before the appellate court for further decision of the appellate court which is before the appellate court. Pending and will be a decision after hearing both parties. Speaking court order \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
