The debtor of the ban on the issue of the execution of Section 47, alleging that the decree petitioner had requested time to be halted for execution, in support of his objection, the judgment debtor Submitted a copy of the Duty Sheet photo which shows that the order was first prepared and that the holder of the order received a fresh order sheet and filed a hanging request which was obtained on the basis of misrepresentation decisions. An inquiry was made on the request of the client, which examined three witnesses who agreed on the point that neither The application form for the certified copy is not available, nor was the clerk of the copy in the respective registers excluded that the photostat copy produced by the decedent was not produced by him and the photostat copy appeared on There was no injunction record except for a decree holder and the execution court was bound to allow it even in the absence of another decree eet the execution court did not inquire into the photostat copy And could file a petition on the basis of a certified copy of the order Could not refuse to suffer, judges lenders dyryktr holder can not present any evidence about complementary refund. The execution could not be further delayed due to the alleged claimant, fake and ambiguous photocopy copy of the judgment, which was set aside by the court and the lower appellate court, pending the execution and execution of the order. The court will be remanded for
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
