HAFIZ MUHAMMAD SAEED versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY, LAHORE
Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 10 Constitutional Review Constitution Review Board is constituted to prevent detention orders, which are designed to provide detainees merely an opinion and to provide protection. Opinion cannot be interpreted by judicial review. The Board did not have the powers of the Government to extend the extension, but the reviewing authority could do so, based on the Board's opinion that there was reason for further detention, so the constitutional petition, therefore, the retention and the High Court Can verify the validity of the Detention Orders In the present case, the dating authority did not provide the basis for detaining detainees within 15 days of the approval of the order, violating the explicit mandatory provisions of Article 10 (5) of the Constitution and attacking them. Was deprived of Petitioner Dents, thus, was not in a position to know his detention and the allegations leveled against the competent forum, so it was in no position that he was completely unaware of the review board for his review. And before that, he faced the allegations when only the law was violated so that he could declare the detention of the applicants an illegal case of the two current applicants. Unlike other dentition cases that were not extended to detention, the dating authority was influenced only by the international agency's contract and did not see any other material in any of the applicants in the UNO resolution. There was no need for detention and no suitable means were available. Their n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
