Find a Lawyer

MALIK ZAFAR IQBAL versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHAKARGARH DISTRICT NAROWAL

Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Court, Appeal Court was rejected by two minors for maintenance of the suit by their mother and the appellate court permanently rejected by the defendant. The adjudicator / decision debtor challenged the concurrent decisions and the orders contained in the constitutional petition, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, taking into account the social status and financial resources of the plaintiff / decision debtor and the decision evidence. Were based on In the absence of any record of misunderstanding and hearing or absence of evidence, concurrent decisions and orders of the following courts cannot be interfered with in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. DISTRICT JUDGE, TOBA TEK SINGH 2009 MLD 816
• AZHAR SIDDIQUE v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), GUJRAT 2009 CLC 819
• ALLAH DITTA v. D.C.O. 2009 CLD 825
• ASHIQ ALI v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 PCrLJ 830
• HIRA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. through Director v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), KASUR 2009 CLD 839
• Malik KHALID HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 840
• IIABIB BANK LTD. v. DOABA CORPORATION through Proprietor 2009 CLD 845
• MUHAMMAD ASAD IQBAL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 847

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

top advocates from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes