COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI versus AKHTER HUSSAIN
After the arrival of the importer of section 79 (1), provisions and importation of 205 goods for import bill, modification of the goods, also filed an admission bill with the application under section 79 (1) of the Customs Act 1969 went. The admission bill for 100% inspection of the consignment for accurate details, quantity, PTC headings, etc., meanwhile the overseas supplier informed the importer that the clearing invoice was not correct and some items were missing. Or is indicated. The importer mistakenly applied to the customs authorities seeking to amend the enrollment bill under section 205 of the Customs Act, 1969; the customs authorities refused to amend the enrollment bill in the enrollment bill A modification was called, it fell within. The accuracy record of the Term Declaration shows that at the time of filing the entry bill, the importer had applied for proviso in terms of section 79 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969. The Nation of Goods, whose request was allowed by the customs authorities to record, added that a formal request was made to amend the entry bill within the stipulated time under which the High Court ordered the importer's entry bill and the custom The edit request was approved correctly. Authorization to finalize appeals filed by customs authorities \ r authorities n
