Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR IFTIKHAR versus SHAHBAZ LATIF

Punishment under Section 10 (d) National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 through section 10 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, by imprisonment sentence, which expressly provides for a pardon of the offender convicted under the said ordinance. Was banned from. In the case of Constitution and Salem Raza v. State PLD 2007 Karachi 139, it was dismissed by the Full Bench of the High Court, in which case no sentence was given and no final victory was reached. National Accountability Ordinance The convicts were appealed in 1999. Excluded accordingly

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY ZONE, ISLAMABAD v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 2015 PTD 1635
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI v. AKHTER HUSSAIN 2015 PTD 1882
• Mst. SUGHRA BEGUM v. QAISER PERVEZ 2015 SCMR 1142
• AMJAD IKRAM v. Mst. ASIYA KAUSAR 2015 SCMR 1
• GHULAM RASOOL v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad 2015 PLD 6
• SIKANDAR SHAH v. RAZA SHAH 2015 SCMR 10
• Mst. SHAHISTA BIBI v. SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, MACH 2015 PLD 15
• A.M. ASSOCIATES v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 PLD 21

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

criminal advocate from Kotla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes