UNION BANK LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY versus B.R.R. INTERNATIONAL MODARABA
Sections 9, 10, 22 and 24 Applying for a Suit Lease Finance Loan from Suit Moderba Company Guarantee to Receive and Defend the Bank It Has Been Assured that the Debtors' Default In this case the responsibility will be discharged. They were also sued by the lenders, as well as the bank / guarantor's leave and petition for defense, dismissed by the trial court by the bank and all the debtors, including bank-issued bank guarantees. The lawsuit was terminated and the timely consultation for the Moderba company as a claim submitted that the financial institutions (retrieval of finances) were in accordance with section 24 of the Ordinance 2001, even after the expiry of the trial period. Could have been established, when there was enough reason. The Moderba Company did not mention the circumstances of the cause in its case, in addition to the provisions of O. VII, R6, CPC Ground O, the case was mentioned in the waiver. The question about the limitation was considered to be a special question of fact and law, the defendants / lenders were entitled to leave leave and the decree was set aside and the case was remanded in court. Below to set the appropriate issues and decide the case based on the parties' requests
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
