Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN OIL FIELDS versus CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD

Sections 35C and 36C appeal to the High Court's order which dismisses the appeal through the appellate tribunal and serves on its parties under section 35C (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which states Can be challenged under Section 36C of the. The appeals of the High Court against the order passed under section 35C (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, are ineligible under section 36C of the principles of the said Act.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ZAKHI FAROOQ v. SAEED AKHTAR 2009 YLR 1654
• UNION BANK LTD. through Attorney v. B.R.R. INTERNATIONAL MODARABA 2009 CLD 1656
• Malik MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. MANAGER AUQAF (MALIK GHULAM HYDER) BAHAWALPUR 2009 YLR 1662
• PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL LEASING CORPORATION v. SUNRISE TEXTILE MILLS 2009 CLD 1662
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman v. RAZI -UR-REHMAN 2009 CLD 1666
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. State 2009 YLR 1670
• TAUNSA GYPSUM (PVT.) LTD v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2009 CLD 1671
• SAMRA ZAMAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION GHULAM MUHAMMAD ABAD, FAISALABAD 2009 YLR 1678

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

famous high court advocate from Badin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes