Find a Lawyer

TANVEER WEAVING MILLS THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR SALES TAX

Article (((?) ())) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Issuing the showcase on Constitutional application 23 2005 2005 After CBR extended the deadline in 12 12 2005, the original order of 28 3 2006 The order was not actually approved after the expiry of 90 days provided for under section 36 of the Sales Tax Act 1990. and that CBR was not authorized to actually issue such notice The order pass period is 90 days, which can be extended by the collector for good reasons before the expiry of 90 days. After the expiry of one year of issuing such notice, Has gone, hi TM set aside the order of the extinct

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• NAZIMA SHAHZADI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION PINDI GHEE DISTRICT ATTOCK 2009 PCrLJ 751
• BUSHRA IMRAN v. WAPDA 2009 PLC(CS) 752
• AHMAD KHAN v. KAUSAR PERVEEN 2009 CLC 759
• INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION v. SARAH TEXTILES LTD. 2009 CLD 761
• MUSHTAQ AHMED MOHAL v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2009 PLC(CS) 763
• KHURRAM ZULIFQAR v. Mst. BENISH MUBARAK 2009 MLD 766
• QASIM ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 769
• SHAKEEL ASGHAR KHAN v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAHIM YAR KHAN 2009 PLC(CS) 770

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Kharan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes