NAZIMA SHAHZADI versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION PINDI GHEE DISTRICT ATTOCK
Section 5 36 & B & 6 376 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Termination of Constitutional Procedure The female applicant had in fact escaped with her accompanying applicant and her father in the FIR investigating officer. He was not taken with her in the manner alleged. The accused were charged with kidnapping. Where a woman was not snatched, there was no crime for her abduction or the prosecution was prosecuted in the final report under section 1773, the CRPC was that the female accused, at her own will, , Along with his accompanying partner went on to marry him, and therefore could not raise any question of his case on the charge of abduction under Section 656565B, the PPC could not be created and the alleged abductor In fact, fate was determined. Regarding the kidnapping charge, the investigator and the District Public Prosecutor emphasized his father's will, ignoring the provisions of Section 65 Will 13, PPC, as well as section 656565. F Sections 7575 & 6 376, PPC did not commit any crime of rape, there was no crime against the accused, it was alleged that they faced investigation due to this crime. There was no doubt that the subject of the investigation was under the exclusive domain of the police; the court, under the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction and inherent powers, needed to keep the public workers in their assigned jurisdiction. Cannot be allowed to take legal action against the accused for crimes they did not commit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
