Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Sections 5, 7 (2), Second Prosecution and Schedule Rehabilitation and Dwyer Recovery have been claimed in a separate case, but in the first case for the dissolution of the marriage, the claim has not been claimed by fraud. The purpose of allowing parties to engage in a variety of reasons for disputed disputes is to avoid the clutter and proceeding of the process of facilitating the principles of parties and courts in a single case.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SARDAR KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 478
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL 2009 CLC 480
• SHAUKAT ALI WAHLA v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB 2009 PLC(CS) 481
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. J.D. SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2009 PTD 481
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. ANSAR MEHMOOD 2009 YLR 486
• Mirza MUHAMMAD ARIF v. CHIEF ENGINEER 2009 PLD 489
• ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2009 PLD 494
• LEATHERWARE (PVT.) LTD:, SIALKOT through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2009 PTD 497

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Burewala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes