Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL

Section 154 The Nazim and the Deputy Nazima's allegations against the Nazim were that they did not possess the educational qualifications set by law to contest elections on the set record. The majority of voters in the constituency did not have the same information that is available on the record for which an Election Tribunal or a single High Court Judge was authorized to pass the High Court order, which is why he and the Moderator The selection of both deputy nominees was null and void, supported by the High Court decision of the single judge in the ultra-court appeal. The law applying the principle of throwing voters out of interference was rejected.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD BILAL v. State 2009 YLR 472
• AFTAB AHMAD KHAN v. GHAFOOR AHMAD 2009 PLD 473
• Sh. RIAZ AHMED v. ATTA MUHAMMAD QURESHI 2009 MLD 476
• SARDAR KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 478
• SHAUKAT ALI WAHLA v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB 2009 PLC(CS) 481
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. J.D. SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2009 PTD 481
• MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2009 PLD 484
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. ANSAR MEHMOOD 2009 YLR 486

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Thatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes