Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD ARIF versus CHIEF ENGINEER

Article 199 Constitutional application A public contract award for the award of a public contract that is full of personal discretion or is subject to personal prejudice No transparent fair or legal process may be deemed mandatory by law with authority. The auction must hold a fully transparent and fair public auction, which shows that the competition is open, based on the first disclosure rules of the auction that are open to all bidders for the projects available for implementation. Provide equal and equitable opportunities where such attributes were missing, the High Court upheld. The auction process was outlawed by the Standing Committee on Irrigation and the new bid will be called for the project to be announced under the new schedule.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SHAUKAT ALI WAHLA v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB 2009 PLC(CS) 481
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. J.D. SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2009 PTD 481
• MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2009 PLD 484
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. ANSAR MEHMOOD 2009 YLR 486
• ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2009 PLD 494
• LEATHERWARE (PVT.) LTD:, SIALKOT through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2009 PTD 497
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2009 PCrLJ 497
• MUHAMMAD ASIF alias ASSA v. State 2009 YLR 498

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Kamalia lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes