SALEH SHAH versus SUPERINTENDENT JAIL, CENTRAL JAIL HARIPUR
Sections 401 and 382B Narcotic Sub-Metals Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Period Counting Legislation Extends the Benefit of Detention Count Towards the sentencing of prisoners, when the court sentenced and relied on the principles of equity and justice so that the detention of the detainees in the trial is not completed, they will have to pay the compensation. Concessions, however, were limited to the length of the sentence imposed on a single prisoner for the duration of the detention period, but would not include a waiver in the sentence given to the prisoners facing trial, as both detention and sentencing varied. There were conditions, which could be. In this regard, neither the intervention nor the explicit intent of the legislature can be defeated by the scope of meaning extension. If Legacy Slatcher wanted to increase the pardon of the convicts, then this expression of ideas and necessary intentions. Could have been a source who was not a prison officer, not just the orders / declaration / pardon in the sentence issued by the President / Government. , But it also clearly violated section 382B, CRPC. And it is also against the relevant rules contained in the jail manual, where prisoners are sentenced to prison and those who face trial are kept poles apart. And thus the prison authorities increased the sentence exemption in the sheets of the prisoner's pardon in the case of the acquittal of law and legal authority without any inadvertent and gross misunderstanding, not only one applicant in the case, but hundreds
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
