Defining the provisions of the 302/324/34 evidence, he clearly mentioned the place where the victim was going from and the accused fired at them. Such witnesses have long been subjected to cross-examination, but their statements were not broken and nothing was brought against the record, which could have reduced their probative value. There was absolutely no conflict between the evidence presented by the prosecution witnesses and the entries made in the site plan, there was no dispute between the government account and the medical evidence as the accounts presented by the public witnesses were also together. Seems natural and straightforward. From the investigative agency to the investigation of any person in this case, to the investigation of any person in this case, the expulsion was not given such importance when all the evidence on record was inconsistent with the accused. If the accusations were made, it is beyond reasonable doubt. And the accused was properly convicted by the trial court. In these situations, the recurrence occurred on the contradiction between the accused and the complaining party, but the facts on which the two accused were 68 years old and The young boy shot at the deceased, still engulfed in mystery, especially when it was not known whose bullet proved effective, and in the circumstances of the case, the same question was to be answered. The ordinary punishment cannot be met, in which case, the enemy will be severely stricken, the death sentence has been changed to life imprisonment, while the amount of compensation and The other convicts will be sentenced by the trial court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
