Section 324/34/337 (ii) / 337 F (ii) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Appeal against the defendants of Section 417 acquitted by the trial court rightfully acquitted of the charges and the benefit of the doubt. I had expanded. The reason is that, although the complainant had charged all his accused with conviction, the prosecutor's witness did not name the co-accused or appear to be an eyewitness to the incident. Did not, however, say that the witness was acquitted against the accused Once, after being acquitted by the perpetrator, such bad order had to show strong and extraordinary grounds for interference. According to the facts of the case, the trial court's contentious decision was rigorous and established admirable principles. Of the evidence; in which no interference was sought because the trial court took some time to maintain and maintain all material aspects of the trial.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
