MUNIR HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT N.-W.F.P.,
Article 199 Constitution Petition Returning on a Civil Service Transfer Applicant who moved on deputation for a period of three years, was sent back to his parent's department before the expiry of the three year period, The applicant said in response to the question that the return notification should be issued without legal authorization without any legal effect. Legal Compensation was a contract between the borrower and the lending authorities, which could be terminated at any stage during the deferment period, which did not guarantee a three-year term. The borrower authority, rather, indicated the maximum duration of the permit, as determined by the initial order of the deposition. And it cannot be determined that the deputy has the right to insist on the expiry of the term of the deposition. There is no law of this law because a deputy must fulfill his term of office. It is at the discretion of the competent authority to send a deputy back to the homeland as and when not required by his services (borrowing department) or his parents' department may be required before he / she is employed. Because he didn't have to work. Impressive order at the place of your choice under which the applicant was sent back home prematurely may result in irregularities without affecting or disagreeing with the terms and conditions of service. The exercise of the superior, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with or interfered with. The court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
