Section 9 (c) Appreciating the evidence The prosecutor's argument that the accused was not charged with the recovery of four kilograms of heroin, the statement of the Inspector / Prosecutor's testimony was denied, and other police official samples separating the heroin were declared heroin. Find. No such amount of heroin could be imposed by the prosecution against the Chemical Examiner suspects, nor was any hostility or rebellion claimed against the prosecutor's witnesses because the defendant had used such large amounts of heroin in history, time and place. Was charged with cultivation. It is alleged by the prosecution that no material contradiction or contradiction was brought on the record to undermine the credibility of the prosecution's evidence. In the absence of hostility / malice of the prosecution's witnesses with the accused, there was no possibility of taking such a large quantity of drugs. The prosecution's witnesses fully supported and supported this case with their conviction, solid and confidential. The statement and it beyond reasonable doubt proved the guilt of the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
