MST. ROZINA REHMAN versus BABAR KHAN, SUB-INSPECTOR, INVESTIGATION, HARIPUR
Section 636363 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1818 188), Section 17373 and A Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Proceedings of the Investigation of a Re-Investigation of a Child, The Kidnapped Boy, Under the Child's Mother IR entered. Article 3 36 PP, PPC Against Unidentified Woman In a supplementary statement, the child's mother accused the woman of the crime, but the girl's mother dismissed the woman for compromise, where the trial took place. Upon the order of the magistrate, the woman said under Section 249A, the CRPC in its statement five months later accused the applicant of the abducted child's complainant / mother who had abducted her child. Was the husband and wife of the local police, which prompted the local police to investigate the matter again. Abducted by the applicant by the constitutional applicant has been justified, after the first acquittal of the accused woman, there is nothing left in the molestation / FIR to be re-investigated or prosecuted in the police court. If there seems to be progress in investigating the matter, the correct way was that he should have left the prosecution before issuing an order to acquit the accused and seek permission from the court to reopen the case. Should have But the police did not meet any of the requirements, no doubt, while under challan 173, the CCP was all judgment before a competent court, to investigate the matter and to look into the matter under section 173, CRPC. There is no obligation to submit another report, but the matter is completely different when Paul
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
