Plaintiffs filed against Sections 6 and 13, who claimed to be joint partners and disputed owners, had already filed a vacant ownership case against the defendant / seller before the rival pre-emptor trial court. As a case of removal. The trial court's decision was also dismissed by the appellate court, considering the parties' hearings and the data available on the record, dismissing both the cases with strong judgment and appealing against them. Transferred the suit land through another vendor claimant's exchange. It claimed that after issuing notice of a student e-post about the transfer / transfer by the claimant in favor of the other seller through the exchange, Les Pendens' theory would become the subject of the exchange, The second transaction was made in favor of the other person, neither the plaintiff prepared the second transaction nor said that the second transaction was vacated by the plaintiff, that the second transaction was filed by the plaintiff as well. Transfer case by transfer pre-emptor Video Registered Deed Transfer case before the notice of Plaintiff Syed by other plaintiff Was not affected by Les Penden's theory because it was said that there was no effect during the transition. The absence of this case, and the issuance of a student suit, was rightly rejected by the lower courts, and their results were in accordance with the principles established by the correct, good evidence and definition of evidence. The High Court maintained
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
