Section 13 & Pre-Trial Case Plaintiff asserts that she is entitled to rights as a participant in partnership, continuity and protection litigation, and that all rights reserved by the registered dead trial court are restored. Provides this Agreement with the Subsidiary Agreement with The appellate court also accepted the right of premature infringement of the plaintiff with respect to the plaintiff's property, but dismissed the plaintiff's case on the basis that he did not name the time and place. Informing them of their contested case was excluded for non-fulfillment of the demands pursuant to Section 13 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987, the accuracy record showed that neither the informant The date, time, place and name was mentioned in the notice, and it was not reported in the notice of the student, the name of the time, place and informant must be mentioned in the plaintiff and irrational. Before becoming a part of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1997, the right to self-determination will be abolished and the judicial decision and the order of the appellate court strictly Was in accordance with the law, and was based on the correct definition of the evidence.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
