Sections 5 and 5 include the Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (1) and 19 (8b) of the Contempt (XLV of 1860), Section 34 Defining the Evidence of the Participant's Illicit Confession, Evidence Decisions I was unacceptable The present case was based on the complainant's statement, which was based solely on the hearing, the property was neither presented to the court nor exhibited, the non-production of the case property was filed by the prosecution. Was suspected to have shaken the very basis of this case. The conviction was the result of speculation and convictions. Material contradictions were appearing in the prosecution case, and many material witnesses were dismissed and advertising intervention against the prosecutor should have been prevented. The prosecutor, without any reasonable doubt, could not prove his case against the accused. The accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
