A. VIII, R2 for recovery of money brought against the chairman of Wapda and five others / defendants for recovering Rs. 60,000 for the cost of cow which died due to negligence of the defendants. It alleged that the storm burst into the night, causing two power poles to fall, which authorities were regularly informed of, but they cut off the power poles. Failed to do. And that because of the negligence of the defendant's cows, the accused's cows were killed by the trial court and the appellate court, along with an order of Rs 35,000 instead of Rs 60,000, because the defendant The accuracy record of the Prayer claimed that at the relevant time, 4400 volts directly supplied power poles fell to the ground due to a storm, which WAPDA officials were regularly informed of, but they There was no correction and due to his negligence, the claimant's cows were killed when they received an electric shock. The local police were also made aware of the situation and state officials were jointly and individually responsible for their actions and errors and the facts and law based on the principles of justification of the decisions of both the courts. On the contrary, the verdict was given under proper reasoning. High Court interferes with the exercise of jurisdiction under section 115, CPC
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
