The defendant recovered the alleged abductor in his trial in appreciation of the section 365 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7B Crime for Adultery (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) evidence. The medical certificate based on the radiologist test was 15 years, which was trivial in the sense of section 361, the PPC found guilty of kidnapping against the accused Paliya. It was reported that the alleged kidnapper had gone on his own accord. In addition, the minority of the kidnappers did not benefit, the crime of adultery also proved, they said, with the statement of the prosecutor's witness, recovery of the medical certificate and the alleged abductor from the accused's house and adultery. Without committing to it. The statement of the prosecutor's witness that her abduction was made unconscious by her consent was corroborated by the statement of the prosecution's other witness, the statement that she was unconscious at the time of the abductor's recovery. And he was conscious while traveling. The accused pleaded that the alleged abductor was living with him as his legally married wife, so to prove the existence of such a fact when an accused pleads for a marriage or gets married legally, But in the present case, the accused did not present any evidence, neither the marriage contract nor any other witness was produced before the court, which could prove that the accused had married the kidnapper. In the absence, the evidence cannot be concluded that the accused was living as a husband with the alleged abductor and that he had committed adultery with the trial court.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
