Testimony of Sections 302 (b), 337f (ii) and 427 of the evidence was reported to have occurred at midnight when it was dark night, the prosecution's witnesses claimed, identified the suspect in the vehicle light. Which is evidence of the prosecution's testimony. Respect will require deep scrutiny because it has been said that witnesses were not only inter-related, but also the deceased's cousin. The eyewitnesses were not a resident of the area where the incident occurred, witnesses said, in light of the incident. The motor vehicle, which did not fit the prospect of the case, showed no motive against the accused for committing the murder of the victim or attacking the complaining party, the story narrated by eyewitnesses was not only impossible. , But also contradicts evidence from other situations. A record FIR was filed 11 hours after the incident so that no such explanation could be made without any delay, although only a minor course delay in filing an FIR was not sufficient to rule out the prosecution's version. But in the strange facts and circumstances of the case, where the incident occurred in the darkness of the night and the identity of the culprits was suspicious, it had gained importance that the FIR was not deliberately and named the culprits. Immediately listed for receiving time to do so: claiming that they identify the accused. The strange facts and the fact of each individual case that Kalashnikov remained in police custody for thirteen days, he corrected the report of the firearms expert, whose reasons
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
