THE STATE THROUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ANTI-NARCOTIC FORCE BALOCHISTAN versus ABDUL SAMAD
Sections 9 (c) and 48 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), appeal against section 417 breach record, showed that the trial court acquitted the defendant / accused on two grounds. (i) That the chemical expert's report was not made part of the record and nothing was in the record which stated that the report was made part and parcel of the trial court record. (ii) It is alleged that the house from which the alleged recovery was made did not prove that it was the property of the accused, whereas, on the contrary, it was concluded that it was the property of someone else, No witnesses, including the investigating officer, were tendered. No chemical expert's report, nor the above report was made as part of the file record or any request made in the scope of section 528, was submitted to the CCPC for evidence to guide additional evidence. In order to enable the accused to refuse. The trial court passed a verdict on the proper scrutiny of the evidence and the law and the order to acquit the accused was on a legal basis, guaranteeing the trial court's interference by the High Court in any improper statement and inaccurate judgment of the trial court. Excluded for non-merit in the absence of use or misunderstanding
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
