Appeal to Section 42 AJK Supreme Court Rules, 1978, OV, R 2 (2) and O XV, R 7 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OI, R 10 O XXII, R 1 Supreme Court Appeal to the representatives of the respondents pending legal proceedings is pending in the Supreme Court, it was brought on record by a petition that one of the respondents died, under the order the appellant's counsel was directed to Take the necessary steps to provide legal representation to the deceased defendant, but not the application for enforcement of the legal rights of the deceased defendant was brought on the day the case was settled, but the next hearing The date for the transfer of the application was stated that the leave appeal was filed after the applicant's death and when the processor server reported it. Regarding the defendant's death, the appellants did not respond and when the Registrar directed them to file a petition to bring the legal representative on record, they were delayed, which clearly broke them. The negligence Supreme Court had the power to allow the application of the deceased party's legal heritage even after some restriction to bring it on record so that the party could not be prosecuted on technical grounds, however, the court was not absolute. And had to maintain it. In view of the facts of each case and the conduct of the party in particular, in deciding such an issue as such, the Supreme Court also had to see if the mandatory supply of the Supreme Court rules was violated. In this case, the Supreme Court should not deviate from free will. Such matters are the rule of law
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2009
