Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), A XXII, R 3 (2) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974) Appeal to dismiss appeal for non-enforcement of the legal heritage of Section 42 suit of deceased appellant. The Court of Appeal filed by the plaintiff in the Supreme Court was partial judgment and the judgment and decision was passed by the Appellate Court through the trial court, the legal heirs of the appellant filed an appeal in the High Court, before the Appellate Court. During the trial, the plaintiff was not killed. Talk to the appellate court in connection with the death of the deceased, who was a woman because her lawyer went abroad, the legal legacy of the deceased plaintiff, who filed an appeal in the High Court against the decision and order of the appellate court, in which it It was prayed that the High Court not only dismissed the petition, but also dismissed the appeal filed before the Court of Appeal. No order was allowed by the appellate court to exclude the appeal by the Tide Appellate Court for the enforcement of the legal heirs of the appellant, nor was any such point taken before the appellate court, nor was the appellate court. It was considered, but the High Court found that the deficiency would be resolved automatically. The appeal was before the Court of Appeal when the death of the plaintiff occurred and not before the trial court when the trial case died during the presentation of the original trial; Was not excluded. 3 (2), CPC, under which the dismissal powers Order XXII, R 3 (2) was stripped, CPC stated that if the legal representatives were enforced for
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2009
