VIII of Article 42 and Azad 54 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (Sun 4) 4 of 4, section (42 (ii) of the law for martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 79 suit declarations and the Supreme Court) Appeal from the original owner of the suit land, who was close.The defendant's relative, despite having died a long time ago, the defendant allegedly falsely approached the registrar of the plaintiff with another person before the deceased registrar. Obtained a power of attorney in his favor by presenting the victim in place of the deceased, executing a sale agreement in relation to the deceased's property; Cha was the son of the defendant, who added that another person (the defendant) was declared a property and a permanent injunction was filed against the defendant, challenging the lawyer and the selling authority proceedings. The trial court dismissed the case, stating that the documents were declared illegal and forged, and said that similar sales proceedings were executed on the basis of a power of attorney. Was, however, accepted the appeal and the case filed by the plaintiff's High Court was dismissed following the appellate court's ruling and ruling. Claimants had sought on behalf of the Supreme Court that leverages the power of attorney, was responsible for the implementation of this document, but they failed to prove the execution of the court's authority. Under the Law of Martyrdom at 1984 1984 1984, to prove at least two witnesses, the authority of power of attorney must prove, execute, the grounds of that process.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2009
