Absent minor inquiries from Rr 3 (d) and 5 duty, the non-holding of a public servant was chosen for a two year course abroad. For this reason, the government employee sought ex-Pakistan leave, which was approved by the government employee, on the basis of further extension of leave that the course was not completed, the authorities refused to extend the job for another six months. And after issuing the showcase notice, the period of overstay was deemed absent from the duty, followed by disciplinary action. Fines were levied against government employees and withholding increments for one year. The sentence imposed by the authorities was upheld by the service tribunal; the authorities passed the order without having to hold regular inquiry against the civil servant, in the present case, to keep the contents of the showcase notice and reply in another place, It would be clear that the matter could not be decided without conducting a regular inquiry contest, the administration did not approve the order to speak against the public servant without regular inquiry into R5 of the Public Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973. Such action by the Authority was not in accordance with the law prescribed by clause (d) of the Supreme Court. ) Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules was an independent provision of R3 of 1973, which was itself a rule that must be processed under R3 (d) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973. It has to be prerequisite, its prerequisites have meaning, so it would also be necessary to keep a civil servant employed for this reason, was a prejudice to national security, leaving the authorized authority on leave.
