FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MIAN MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF
Sections 14 (5) (5A), (6), 11 and 99 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 184 (3), 199, 225, 63 (h) (1) and 188 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, A. XXVI, R 8 The eligibility and disqualification of the candidates for election decisions under review of the Supreme Court decision were presented to the High Court and the Supreme Court, thereby giving some factual aspects and legal provisions on the issues raised. Was brought to the front, they were not brought. Until the court notes and, therefore, justice was not considered to be a misunderstanding, such error appears on the face of a review of the record record that would have led to the extraordinary removal of Superior Courts judges. And recognize extraordinary events. The verdict, it was stated, was - through a cruel force, deviating from the constitutional clauses - to trigger an unprecedented movement across the country, ending the restoration of these judges, and during the holiday, uncontested. Subsequently, the applicants' case cannot be declared a compromise nor can anyone be shown any prejudice before the courts; the finding of factual facts based on such assumptions is considered as interference with the jurisdiction of the review That is, both the appeals are filed under Section 14 (5) of the Representation. To decide on appeals in the Schedule issued before or under the People Act, 1976 and nomination papers (under section 14 (5A) of the said Act) The decision had to be made. Under Section 11, the Chief Election Commissioner read with section 14 (5) of the said Act. Since the appeals decision was not made till then, the Chief Election Commissioner
